How was it done? ("Contract Law")
What did it cost?
Who profits?
Is there a solution?
Saturday, December 30, 2006
"OWNERSHIP"
How was it done? ("Contract Law")
What did it cost?
Who profits?
Is there a solution?
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Write-in Results
The official write-in results of the 2006 Pennsylvania General Election have been posted to the Department of State website. Click here to see the results. The Congressional results will be found on page two (2) of the document.
If you were someone who exercised your write-in options, "Thank you" for your participation.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
THANK YOU
Thank you for asserting one, or more, of your write-in options at the polls during the 2006 Mid-Term Elections. Your participation was, and is, sincerely appreciated.
Friday, October 20, 2006
CAMPAIGN ISSUES
Like many voters who inhabit the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania I have been receiving the expensive, glossy, full color Hegelian styled, bipartisan, issues management campaign ads from Republican incumbent, Don Sherwood and Democrat, Chris Carney. Since the beginning of October, I have received (at least) 12 of these ads and the letter from Carol Sherwood exonerating her husband from what she refers to as, his "mistake." I noticed that each of these financially endowed candidates have used their political capital to defame the character of the other rather than exposing the truth; i.e., that they want nothing more than to continue the 'business-as-usual' practices and agenda for their plutocratic investors.
Recent published 'Letters to the Editor' (Scranton Times-Tribune - 10/19/06) suggests a heightened level of perception among their readers that neither candidate will be able to remedy the damage that has been done to the integrity of our constitutional republic. To paraphrase an old saying: Emotional rhetoric may dupe some of the people some of the time, but it cannot dupe all of the people all of the time. Here are a few examples of how these ads (taken from the recently published Letters to the Editor), are duping the people.
L M, who misspelled 'Hannevig', took issue that "Mr. Sherwood, an elected congressman, identified himself to a D.C police officer as a mere "government employee."" Sherwood, in my opinion, did not lie. Sherwood was financed to run to represent the modern day privy council's corporate governance. Both candidates, Don Sherwood and Chris Carney, were on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania (UNA-USA) in 2002. Either candidate is, therefore, obligated to his corporate employer.
D McB, C C, S P, and J G-E, all commented (in various ways) about Don Sherwood's infidelity while seeming to ignore the fact that Democrat Paul Kanjorski remained silent about this matter that, were he faithful to his party, may have swayed the presidential count in northeastern Pennsylvania to Kerry; the candidate whose values were thought to be less pious than Bush's. It's quite evident that leaders in the two parties consider "fidelity" to be relevant only to the party faithful on which they are dependent.
L B wrote, "Mr. Carney's record on the Second Amendment is dismal. He is rated an "F" by the NRA". I remind Mr. B that, in the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 21, "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." In Pennsylvania, the right to keep and bear arms is NOT a Second Amendment (Militia) issue. When purchasing arms, one question asked is, by Pennsylvania law, one question too many! The duty of a representative is to advocate for the citizens and their state to retain the unaliened rights implied by their State's Constitution. Therefore, the NRA's representative to Congress must be someone who will "preserve, protect and defend," with fidelity, the people's rights as retained and reserved to them by their state's constitution pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (The 9th and 10th Amendments limit federal encroachment into the powers of the State and the people therein.)
P M comments; "Don Sherwood has released an ad claiming that Chris Carney is going to raise your taxes." These tax issues, when understood, are the best example of bipartisan issue management. Whether Carney or Sherwood is elected to Congress will not matter. Both will be obligated to maintain or advance the various aspects of global governance envisioned by their corporate employers. Since Congress relinquished its power to coin money to a private cartel of bankers in 1913, there has been a progressive hidden tax involved with the printing of metallically devalued coins and Federal Reserve notes. For instance; It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve between $.04 (four cents) and $.07 (seven cents) to print a "bill" of any denomination. Therefore, at 4 cents/bill, for every $10 of a man (or woman's) labor, $9.96 is pocketed by the owners of the Federal Reserve and an additional $2 (approximately 20% of the $10) is demanded by IRS agents on behalf of their employers; the owners of the Federal Reserve.
The bipartisan issues management processes and procedures preclude open minor party and independent debate that would educate the voters to their approximate $11.96 indebtedness to the owners of the Federal Reserve for every $10 of their labor; a despicable system of voluntary servitude that, with little disruption to the average American, could be legislated back under the powers of Congress whereby the IRS would be abolished, and $9.96 would be recycled into the Constitutionally delegated services to be provided by Congress.
The continued bipartisan perpetuation of this irresponsible fraud on the American people by their bipartisan elected representatives to Congress is morally reprehensible and unlikely to be remedied by electing more bipartisan candidates.
Fortunately, as stated before, emotional rhetoric cannot dupe all of the people all of the time.
In Pennsylvania, more than 14,000 voters in the 10th Congressional District showed by their vote in the 2004 election that they wanted representative change in Congress. This year, it may take a few minutes more but, you can utilize the democratic process by writing-in minor party, or independent candidates who have showed a willingness to run, but did not attain 2006 ballot access. If you write me in, I would be honored to serve the concerned people of northeastern Pennsylvania who desire to transition from this insidious form of voluntary servitude to a bipartisan corporate governance, back into the envisioned blessings of Liberty as magnificently outlined in the Constitutions for these united States and the Pennsylvania republic.
Recent published 'Letters to the Editor' (Scranton Times-Tribune - 10/19/06) suggests a heightened level of perception among their readers that neither candidate will be able to remedy the damage that has been done to the integrity of our constitutional republic. To paraphrase an old saying: Emotional rhetoric may dupe some of the people some of the time, but it cannot dupe all of the people all of the time. Here are a few examples of how these ads (taken from the recently published Letters to the Editor), are duping the people.
L M, who misspelled 'Hannevig', took issue that "Mr. Sherwood, an elected congressman, identified himself to a D.C police officer as a mere "government employee."" Sherwood, in my opinion, did not lie. Sherwood was financed to run to represent the modern day privy council's corporate governance. Both candidates, Don Sherwood and Chris Carney, were on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania (UNA-USA) in 2002. Either candidate is, therefore, obligated to his corporate employer.
D McB, C C, S P, and J G-E, all commented (in various ways) about Don Sherwood's infidelity while seeming to ignore the fact that Democrat Paul Kanjorski remained silent about this matter that, were he faithful to his party, may have swayed the presidential count in northeastern Pennsylvania to Kerry; the candidate whose values were thought to be less pious than Bush's. It's quite evident that leaders in the two parties consider "fidelity" to be relevant only to the party faithful on which they are dependent.
L B wrote, "Mr. Carney's record on the Second Amendment is dismal. He is rated an "F" by the NRA". I remind Mr. B that, in the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 21, "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." In Pennsylvania, the right to keep and bear arms is NOT a Second Amendment (Militia) issue. When purchasing arms, one question asked is, by Pennsylvania law, one question too many! The duty of a representative is to advocate for the citizens and their state to retain the unaliened rights implied by their State's Constitution. Therefore, the NRA's representative to Congress must be someone who will "preserve, protect and defend," with fidelity, the people's rights as retained and reserved to them by their state's constitution pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (The 9th and 10th Amendments limit federal encroachment into the powers of the State and the people therein.)
P M comments; "Don Sherwood has released an ad claiming that Chris Carney is going to raise your taxes." These tax issues, when understood, are the best example of bipartisan issue management. Whether Carney or Sherwood is elected to Congress will not matter. Both will be obligated to maintain or advance the various aspects of global governance envisioned by their corporate employers. Since Congress relinquished its power to coin money to a private cartel of bankers in 1913, there has been a progressive hidden tax involved with the printing of metallically devalued coins and Federal Reserve notes. For instance; It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve between $.04 (four cents) and $.07 (seven cents) to print a "bill" of any denomination. Therefore, at 4 cents/bill, for every $10 of a man (or woman's) labor, $9.96 is pocketed by the owners of the Federal Reserve and an additional $2 (approximately 20% of the $10) is demanded by IRS agents on behalf of their employers; the owners of the Federal Reserve.
The bipartisan issues management processes and procedures preclude open minor party and independent debate that would educate the voters to their approximate $11.96 indebtedness to the owners of the Federal Reserve for every $10 of their labor; a despicable system of voluntary servitude that, with little disruption to the average American, could be legislated back under the powers of Congress whereby the IRS would be abolished, and $9.96 would be recycled into the Constitutionally delegated services to be provided by Congress.
The continued bipartisan perpetuation of this irresponsible fraud on the American people by their bipartisan elected representatives to Congress is morally reprehensible and unlikely to be remedied by electing more bipartisan candidates.
Fortunately, as stated before, emotional rhetoric cannot dupe all of the people all of the time.
In Pennsylvania, more than 14,000 voters in the 10th Congressional District showed by their vote in the 2004 election that they wanted representative change in Congress. This year, it may take a few minutes more but, you can utilize the democratic process by writing-in minor party, or independent candidates who have showed a willingness to run, but did not attain 2006 ballot access. If you write me in, I would be honored to serve the concerned people of northeastern Pennsylvania who desire to transition from this insidious form of voluntary servitude to a bipartisan corporate governance, back into the envisioned blessings of Liberty as magnificently outlined in the Constitutions for these united States and the Pennsylvania republic.
'One of us cannot do everything, but one of us can do something.'
Click here to see where the candidates stand on immigration.
Tuesday, August 01, 2006
"What would Jesus and/or Mosheh do?"
Both Mosheh and Jesus knew the laws of nature, the laws of man, and the laws of GOD.
Both men, if they lived in the flesh today in Pennsylvania, would know that Article 1, Section 2 of the CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA states:
All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.
Knowing that they had choices;
What would Jesus do
? - What would Mosheh do?Would they:
(a) alter, (b) reform, or (c) abolish
Their government?
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Gasoline at 10 Cents a Gallon . . .
Does gasoline at 10 cents a gallon and falling sound impossible in today's world?
Well, if you think it's impossible, you're wrong. Because that's where gasoline actually is, and it looks like it's going even lower.
Of course, it's not 10 cents a gallon in today's paper money. But it is 10 cents a gallon in the Constitutional money of the United States, which is gold coin and bullion.
Read more: Gasoline at 10 Cents a Gallon and Falling - by George Reisman
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
The Legal vs Lawful
Circa 1764
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.
The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.
-- English Nursery Rhyme c. 1764 --
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
The greater issue before our nation and the world
Here is an excerpt from Paul Craig Roberts' article Bush Has Crossed the Rubicon
In effect, Bush is asserting the powers that accrued to Hitler in 1933. His Federalist Society apologists and Department of Justice appointees claim that President Bush has the same power to interpret the Constitution as the Supreme Court. An Alito Court is likely to agree with this false claim.
This is the great issue that is before the country. But it is pushed into the background by political battles over abortion and homosexual rights. Many people fighting to strengthen the executive think they are fighting against legitimizing sodomy and murder in the womb. They are unaware that the real issue is that America is on the verge of elevating its president above the law.
Bush Justice Department official and Berkeley law professor John Yoo argues that no law can restrict the president in his role as commander-in-chief. Thus, once the president is at war – even a vague open-ended "war on terror" - Bush's Justice Department says the president is free to undertake any action in pursuit of war, including the torture of children and indefinite detention of American citizens.
The commander-in-chief role is probably sufficiently elastic to expand to any crisis, whether real or fabricated. Thus has the US arrived at the verge of dictatorship.
Friday, September 02, 2005
Where are the brooms and shovels in New Orleans?
Have government regulations become so restrictive that the living cannot maintain sanitation by respectfully removing dead bodies from their midst?
Hurricane Katrina has indeed been a tragedy of catastrophic proportions for the people along the Gulf coast. However, the psycho-social implications of incremental Congressional legislation since Roosevelt's "New Deal" is apparent in the pictures coming out of New Orleans via TV.
As I watch, I see many idle people sitting amidst piles of trash and, occasionally, dead bodies. These scenes have shown a remnant of New Orleanins chanting that they need help, yet they seem to be doing nothing to clean up the relatively small area closest to them: Trash and bodies that can lead to foul odors and, ultimately, disease!
Without a doubt, water, food and shelter are vital commodities that need to be provided from sources outside this affected area. But, when it comes to the remnant's self-responsible behaviors (i.e., cleaning around their personal space), this level of dependency on NGO's, and the statutory agents/agencies of federal government to do for them what they can do for themselves should be critically questioned.
Indeed!
Where are the brooms and shovels in New Orleans? And;
Have government regulations become so restrictive that the living cannot maintain sanitation by respectfully removing dead bodies from their midst?
An UPDATE to this post was attempted when I learned that the family of a woman in a "wheel chair" had filed a law suit. The links were removed because the AP News and Find Law links for the articles no longer worked. I don't know if the woman in the 'wheel chair' is the same as the woman in the 'lawn chair', but I wish the family swift vindication for the wrongs that they suffered at the hands of those who are paid to do that which is right.
You do have options.
Click here to see what they are. And here to see why they are necessary.
Hurricane Katrina has indeed been a tragedy of catastrophic proportions for the people along the Gulf coast. However, the psycho-social implications of incremental Congressional legislation since Roosevelt's "New Deal" is apparent in the pictures coming out of New Orleans via TV.
As I watch, I see many idle people sitting amidst piles of trash and, occasionally, dead bodies. These scenes have shown a remnant of New Orleanins chanting that they need help, yet they seem to be doing nothing to clean up the relatively small area closest to them: Trash and bodies that can lead to foul odors and, ultimately, disease!
Without a doubt, water, food and shelter are vital commodities that need to be provided from sources outside this affected area. But, when it comes to the remnant's self-responsible behaviors (i.e., cleaning around their personal space), this level of dependency on NGO's, and the statutory agents/agencies of federal government to do for them what they can do for themselves should be critically questioned.
Indeed!
Where are the brooms and shovels in New Orleans? And;
Have government regulations become so restrictive that the living cannot maintain sanitation by respectfully removing dead bodies from their midst?
An UPDATE to this post was attempted when I learned that the family of a woman in a "wheel chair" had filed a law suit. The links were removed because the AP News and Find Law links for the articles no longer worked. I don't know if the woman in the 'wheel chair' is the same as the woman in the 'lawn chair', but I wish the family swift vindication for the wrongs that they suffered at the hands of those who are paid to do that which is right.
You do have options.
Click here to see what they are. And here to see why they are necessary.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts' Frame-of-Reference
Since Article 4, Section 4, of the US Constitution "shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"; To whose "Form of Government" is John Roberts, a Harvard graduate, referring when he expresses a "profound appreciation for the role of the court in our constitutional democracy"?
Here is a transcript of a portion of Nominee Roberts' 7/19/2005 acceptance speech from USA Today:
Here is a transcript of a portion of Nominee Roberts' 7/19/2005 acceptance speech from USA Today:
ROBERTS: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.
Thank you very much. It is both an honor and very humbling to be nominated to serve on the Supreme Court. Before I became a judge, my law practice consisted largely of arguing cases before the court. That experience left me with a profound appreciation for the role of the court in our constitutional democracy and a deep regard for the court as an institution.
Thursday, July 07, 2005
The London Explosions
I feel deep sorrow for all the victims of violent acts worldwide that are perpetrated on behalf of a handful of men/women who have an agenda to dominate. What is even more disturbing, however, is how effectively the American people have been manipulated by Madison Avenue words and visuals to buy into this agenda to the point that they are willingly contributing to their own destruction.
For instance: "Terror" is not an "act". "Terror" is a "feeling"; an "emotion".
There are two (2) proven strategies to overcome an emotion: Drugs and Empowerment.
It's been my observation that Congress' focus since the "Brady Bill" and "911" has been to disempower Americans.
Congress has been inclined to use tax payers' debt based dollars to; fund programs that screen for emotional dis-ease, create data bases which include that such screening data to be put on "mandatory" identification cards for which the people are expected to pay a cost, and protect the sharing of the people's personal information with global commercial banking and insurance entities that will eventually benefit the owners of the pharmaceutical companies, who will in turn have legal commercial access to those who have voluntarily opted into their actuarial, pharmaceutical and other studies. I suspect that Herr Mengla is smiling in his grave.
Additionally: Since both the Euro and Dollar are a debt based units of currency; How are the people's of the nations who use this currency to ever pay off a debt with a debt? Intellectually and morally this is absurd! Intellectually and morally this is 'indebted servitude'/"peonage" perpetrated and maintained by a handful of men who globally manipulate the money supply as their allied media strokes the emotions of the people under the guise of "democracy"!
As for this current "War"; It makes sense to me that "Christian" America would be pitted against the "Islamic" nations. How else can the agenda of those who profit from a debt based monetary system, whether the Dollar or the Euro, continue their dominion if there is honest trade among the nations with a tangible currency based on "honest weights and measures".
If we had enough men and women in Congress that took their oath of office seriously, we would have a tangible monetary system, be at peace with Islamic nations, and best of all, there would be no need for those with an agenda to pit believing nations against one another under the guise of "terror". Unlike a drugged or disempowered person, an empowered people have few excuses (if any) to tolerate injustices, or to injure or damage their neighbor.
For instance: "Terror" is not an "act". "Terror" is a "feeling"; an "emotion".
There are two (2) proven strategies to overcome an emotion: Drugs and Empowerment.
It's been my observation that Congress' focus since the "Brady Bill" and "911" has been to disempower Americans.
Congress has been inclined to use tax payers' debt based dollars to; fund programs that screen for emotional dis-ease, create data bases which include that such screening data to be put on "mandatory" identification cards for which the people are expected to pay a cost, and protect the sharing of the people's personal information with global commercial banking and insurance entities that will eventually benefit the owners of the pharmaceutical companies, who will in turn have legal commercial access to those who have voluntarily opted into their actuarial, pharmaceutical and other studies. I suspect that Herr Mengla is smiling in his grave.
Additionally: Since both the Euro and Dollar are a debt based units of currency; How are the people's of the nations who use this currency to ever pay off a debt with a debt? Intellectually and morally this is absurd! Intellectually and morally this is 'indebted servitude'/"peonage" perpetrated and maintained by a handful of men who globally manipulate the money supply as their allied media strokes the emotions of the people under the guise of "democracy"!
As for this current "War"; It makes sense to me that "Christian" America would be pitted against the "Islamic" nations. How else can the agenda of those who profit from a debt based monetary system, whether the Dollar or the Euro, continue their dominion if there is honest trade among the nations with a tangible currency based on "honest weights and measures".
If we had enough men and women in Congress that took their oath of office seriously, we would have a tangible monetary system, be at peace with Islamic nations, and best of all, there would be no need for those with an agenda to pit believing nations against one another under the guise of "terror". Unlike a drugged or disempowered person, an empowered people have few excuses (if any) to tolerate injustices, or to injure or damage their neighbor.
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
FEDS CALL COURT CERTIFIED DOCUMENTS A "THEORY" IN BILL BENSON CASE
Posted: February 15, 2005
1:05 AM Eastern
NewsWithViews.com
Bill Benson is a former revenue collector for the State of Illinois. Back in 1984, Benson was commissioned to conduct an investigation into the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Benson traveled to all 48 states which had been admitted to the Union at the time of the ratification of this amendment in 1913. He spent close to a year in the bowels of these state archives collecting official documents.
What Benson found according to legal researchers was nothing short of a bombshell: Not only was the Sixteenth Amendment - the so-called "income tax amendment' never ratified by the required number of states, he also discovered that the Seventeenth Amendment wasn't ratified either.
More . . .
1:05 AM Eastern
NewsWithViews.com
Bill Benson is a former revenue collector for the State of Illinois. Back in 1984, Benson was commissioned to conduct an investigation into the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Benson traveled to all 48 states which had been admitted to the Union at the time of the ratification of this amendment in 1913. He spent close to a year in the bowels of these state archives collecting official documents.
What Benson found according to legal researchers was nothing short of a bombshell: Not only was the Sixteenth Amendment - the so-called "income tax amendment' never ratified by the required number of states, he also discovered that the Seventeenth Amendment wasn't ratified either.
More . . .
Sunday, January 23, 2005
"OWNERSHIP": WHAT DOES IT MEAN, AND WHO HAS IT?
Here are some questions I had during the "ownership" portion of President Bush's Inaugural speech on Thursday, January 20, 2005. The text of that portion of President Bush's speech is as follows:
"In America's ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance - preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal."
Here are my questions:
President Bush seems to be making a clear distinction between "Americans" and "citizens" in his speech. Is he?
What is the definitional difference (legal and otherwise) between having "Liberty" and being afforded statutory "freedom"?
What are the Liberties of a "citizen"? And, How are they the same, or different, from those pertaining to "the people"?
When a "citizen" becomes and "agent" doesn't he/she enter into a "commercial" relationship?
To whom are President Bush referring to as his "fellow Americans" who will "make", with him, "every citizen an agent" of "his or her own destiny"?
Why are President Bush's "fellow Americans" who have the power to make a "citizen" an "agent of his or her own destiny" concerned about "want and fear"?
President Bush seems to be outlining a global hierarchy in his speech. Is there a global hierarchy? If so, what is your status in this hierarchy? How do you perceive mine?
If a hierarchy exists; Do our representatives represent an 'endowed' "people" with "Liberty", or do they administrate the statutory "freedoms" dictated by those who are the most privileged within the hierarchy?
What does President Bush and his "fellow Americans" have planned for those men and women who they perceive to be "citizens" and "agents"?
What will be the fate of men and women who continue to believe themselves to be "endowed by their Creator (aka, "Nature's God") with unalienable Rights"?
To whom will President Bush be widening "the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance"? And, how will this impact the men and women who continue to believe that they have the Liberty by Divine Law to their own unaliened possession of; "homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance"?
And, per President Bush in another part of his speech; "Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave." Who then is protecting and defending the 'self-evident truths' and the "imperative" "Right" to "self-government" for the people of the endowment?
"In America's ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance - preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal."
Here are my questions:
President Bush seems to be making a clear distinction between "Americans" and "citizens" in his speech. Is he?
What is the definitional difference (legal and otherwise) between having "Liberty" and being afforded statutory "freedom"?
What are the Liberties of a "citizen"? And, How are they the same, or different, from those pertaining to "the people"?
When a "citizen" becomes and "agent" doesn't he/she enter into a "commercial" relationship?
To whom are President Bush referring to as his "fellow Americans" who will "make", with him, "every citizen an agent" of "his or her own destiny"?
Why are President Bush's "fellow Americans" who have the power to make a "citizen" an "agent of his or her own destiny" concerned about "want and fear"?
President Bush seems to be outlining a global hierarchy in his speech. Is there a global hierarchy? If so, what is your status in this hierarchy? How do you perceive mine?
If a hierarchy exists; Do our representatives represent an 'endowed' "people" with "Liberty", or do they administrate the statutory "freedoms" dictated by those who are the most privileged within the hierarchy?
What does President Bush and his "fellow Americans" have planned for those men and women who they perceive to be "citizens" and "agents"?
What will be the fate of men and women who continue to believe themselves to be "endowed by their Creator (aka, "Nature's God") with unalienable Rights"?
To whom will President Bush be widening "the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance"? And, how will this impact the men and women who continue to believe that they have the Liberty by Divine Law to their own unaliened possession of; "homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance"?
And, per President Bush in another part of his speech; "Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave." Who then is protecting and defending the 'self-evident truths' and the "imperative" "Right" to "self-government" for the people of the endowment?
Saturday, November 27, 2004
"We can't tell you."
Not too many years ago we were told; "Ignorance of the law is no excuse".
Recently, when someone chooses to defend themself against terroristic threats and harassment by agents who represent the U.S. Treasury in one form or another under "color of law", they are told by the judiciary that those agents "don't have to tell you" the reason they terrorize and harass rather than simply abiding by the laws that were enacted to govern their activities and behaviors.
Now, according to former Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth-Hage (R-ID) and designer and philanthropist John Gilmore, who were detained by airport security agents, when they questioned the authority that required them to show government issued photo ID and submit to pat-downs the agents told them, "I can't tell you".
Thanks to Mr. Gilmore we don't have to be ignorant of the law. Further information on Gilmore v. Ashcroft, which is pending on appeal, can be found here. To view a summary of this litigation click here.
Recently, when someone chooses to defend themself against terroristic threats and harassment by agents who represent the U.S. Treasury in one form or another under "color of law", they are told by the judiciary that those agents "don't have to tell you" the reason they terrorize and harass rather than simply abiding by the laws that were enacted to govern their activities and behaviors.
Now, according to former Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth-Hage (R-ID) and designer and philanthropist John Gilmore, who were detained by airport security agents, when they questioned the authority that required them to show government issued photo ID and submit to pat-downs the agents told them, "I can't tell you".
Thanks to Mr. Gilmore we don't have to be ignorant of the law. Further information on Gilmore v. Ashcroft, which is pending on appeal, can be found here. To view a summary of this litigation click here.
Friday, November 12, 2004
What does "Marlboro" have to do with "Political Capital", government run public schools, "Human Capital" and a Social Security Numbered "Mercenary Force"?
And how are ledger accounts kept by a Global Corporate Plutocracy?
I was outraged when I saw the cover page from the November 10, 2004 New York Post!!
The page (which has been since put in the NY Post's archives) was an obvious marketing technique to market Marlboro cigarettes, and gain support for President Bush and his corporate buddies' war in Iraq. This slick method of advertising had me wondering how much more blatant manipulation of the sincere patriotism of Americans will the editors of our newspapers engage in for the greedy gain of their corporate masters?
What's it going to take for a simple majority of the people to catch on about how our young men and women are being used as "POLITICAL CAPITAL" for the increased wealth of the Bush family and his Corporate Cronies - including Teresa, John, Bill and Hillary??
Since our military became "all volunteer" it - BY DEFINITION - became a "Mercenary Force" for the aforementioned plutocracy!
By definition, a Mercenary Force can be "legally" hired out to a Corporate entity for the purpose of protecting that entity's interests on foreign soil. If that Corporate entity has diverse holdings, is it any wonder why the New York Post's cover picture on November 10, 2004 is advertising "Marlboro" cigarettes???
In my opinion, the shift into a corporate global governance is as voluntary as our patriotism!
Remember when under Common Law the people referred to their government employees as "Public Servants"?
Remember when those "Public Servants" became, "Personnel"?
And then, "Human Resources" under corporate federalism? ("Resources", by the way, are disposable!)
Now the term is "Human Capital"!
What is "Capital"?
What do you suppose a "slave" would be called in today's legal terminology?
According to the intellectual doublespeak of Paul M. Johnson, Dept. of Political Science, Auburn University
Human capital is:
A loose catch-all term for the practical knowledge, acquired skills and learned abilities of an individual that make him or her potentially productive and thus equip him or her to earn income in exchange for labor.
More . . .
Monday, November 08, 2004
Montour County Responds
"I don't know about the discrepancies reported by the media and LWV, but our officail count for Montour County as of Friday is Sherwood 5596, Hannevig 818. We still need to wait until after the 15th for any additional military and overseas absentees that may come back, but the number we still have out is very small."
Darlis Dyer
"I don't know about the discrepancies reported by the media and LWV, but our officail count for Montour County as of Friday is Sherwood 5596, Hannevig 818. We still need to wait until after the 15th for any additional military and overseas absentees that may come back, but the number we still have out is very small."
Darlis Dyer
Sunday, November 07, 2004
Voting irregularities are not just limited to "electronic ballots".
In the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania, Lycoming County uses mechanical "lever" voting machines, and Montour County uses "punch cards".
CNN and Times-Leader reported the following results:
Lycoming County (lever):
Sherwood - 21,036
Hannevig - 841
Montour County (punch cards):
Sherwood - 5,560
Hannevig - 811
The Scranton Tribune and League of Women Voters reported:
Lycoming County (lever):
Sherwood - 20,012
Hannevig - 814
Montour County (punch cards):
Sherwood - 5,560
Hannevig - 551
I have requested clarification and we are in anticipation of a timely response to these questions from employees of the Commonwealth, Montour and Lycoming Counties.
If you feel the need to express self-responsible outrage, please feel at liberty to do so. Here are the links.
Montour County Courthouse
29 Mill Street
Danville, PA 17821
(570)271-3000 voice
(570)271-3088 fax
commissioners@montourco.org
Mr. Fred Pfeiffer
Voter Registration Supervisor
48 W. Third St.
Williamsport, PA 17701-0536
(570) 327-2267
fpfeiffer/lyco@lyco.org
In the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania, Lycoming County uses mechanical "lever" voting machines, and Montour County uses "punch cards".
CNN and Times-Leader reported the following results:
Lycoming County (lever):
Sherwood - 21,036
Hannevig - 841
Montour County (punch cards):
Sherwood - 5,560
Hannevig - 811
The Scranton Tribune and League of Women Voters reported:
Lycoming County (lever):
Sherwood - 20,012
Hannevig - 814
Montour County (punch cards):
Sherwood - 5,560
Hannevig - 551
I have requested clarification and we are in anticipation of a timely response to these questions from employees of the Commonwealth, Montour and Lycoming Counties.
If you feel the need to express self-responsible outrage, please feel at liberty to do so. Here are the links.
Montour County Courthouse
29 Mill Street
Danville, PA 17821
(570)271-3000 voice
(570)271-3088 fax
commissioners@montourco.org
Mr. Fred Pfeiffer
Voter Registration Supervisor
48 W. Third St.
Williamsport, PA 17701-0536
(570) 327-2267
fpfeiffer/lyco@lyco.org
Wednesday, November 03, 2004
Election Results
The election results have been tabulated in the Times Leader.
While the percentage of the votes cast for me sounds small at 7.02%, this percentage translates into 14,450 people who took the time to look at the bottom line and deliberately moved the lever in the direction of Liberty.
As you read the results take into consideration that the total numbers do not reflect the total number of the voters in those counties. During the coming months take the time to speak to your friends and neighbors about their political options and encourage them to make "bottom line" choices.
(The Constitution Party candidates were on the bottom line of the ballot.)
Again: Thank you for your vote.
The election results have been tabulated in the Times Leader.
While the percentage of the votes cast for me sounds small at 7.02%, this percentage translates into 14,450 people who took the time to look at the bottom line and deliberately moved the lever in the direction of Liberty.
As you read the results take into consideration that the total numbers do not reflect the total number of the voters in those counties. During the coming months take the time to speak to your friends and neighbors about their political options and encourage them to make "bottom line" choices.
(The Constitution Party candidates were on the bottom line of the ballot.)
Again: Thank you for your vote.
Tuesday, October 26, 2004
POLITICS IS DIRTY
My campaign message is being directed to a people who believe themselves to be free. My message is not to those who enjoy the chains of enslavement for political expediency. With that said, I remind you that we have been "endowed" by our Creator. We have the option to responsibly protect and defend that endowment, or to relinquish its care to the whims of treasonous legislators via liens and licensure lobbied on behalf of International Bankers through the U.S. Treasury and their debt based monetary system.
Should you choose me to represent your Liberties at the federal level of our Constitutional republic, here are the foundations of that Liberty that I will uphold and defend according to "The Bill of Rights", specifically the 9th and 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
PREAMBLE
WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful
to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious
liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and
establish this Constitution.
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT:
. . .
Sec. 2. All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.
Sec. 3. All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can of right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent; no human authority can, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishment or modes of worship.
More . . .
On November 2, 2004, the choice is yours.
My campaign message is being directed to a people who believe themselves to be free. My message is not to those who enjoy the chains of enslavement for political expediency. With that said, I remind you that we have been "endowed" by our Creator. We have the option to responsibly protect and defend that endowment, or to relinquish its care to the whims of treasonous legislators via liens and licensure lobbied on behalf of International Bankers through the U.S. Treasury and their debt based monetary system.
Should you choose me to represent your Liberties at the federal level of our Constitutional republic, here are the foundations of that Liberty that I will uphold and defend according to "The Bill of Rights", specifically the 9th and 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
PREAMBLE
WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful
to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious
liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and
establish this Constitution.
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT:
. . .
Sec. 2. All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.
Sec. 3. All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can of right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent; no human authority can, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishment or modes of worship.
More . . .
On November 2, 2004, the choice is yours.
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
Sunday, August 29, 2004
Is your allegiance to a Corporate Plutocracy or to a Constitutional Republic?
I received this message today from an alleged "educator".
I received this message today from an alleged "educator".
As a college professor, my dirty little secret is the fact that I can convince people that I really hate George Bush. Along with my public school teachers, we really don't care who wins this election. There's no economic impact on my pocketbook no matter who gets in. See, I'm guaranteed employment as a state servant of the education system. They love me enough to keep me around forever. So as I said, I don't care who wins. Now the rest of you may care if you put in a waffler or a cowboy, I don't. As I said, my job is secure and secure for life. Sorry. Bye.
Saturday, August 28, 2004
Marlene Tobin, Americans For Fair Taxation (AFFT) PA State Director recently requested feedback from all candidates regarding their "Fair Tax" position. AFFT currently has a score card on their web which lists all incumbents and their position on FairTax. They are planning to post an updated FairTax scorecard on their State website listing each incumbent and candidate running for election in 2004. Here is an abstract of the Bill and my response.
As I see it, on top of credit card, car, and mortgage payments and interest, approximately $9.96 is the laboring man's debt to the owners of the Federal Reserve for each $10.00 of his labor. Here's how:
The "bill" which a laboring man perceives he has earned for his labor cost the Federal Reserve approximately4.2 cents to print - regardless of its denomination. In reality this means that for every $10.00 of a man's labor, he is in debt approximately $9.96 to the owners of the Federal Reserve; $19.96 for every $20.00, and $99.96 for every $100.00.
Should the proposed "national sales tax" be implemented at a typical 7% using the current currency: For every $100.00 purchase the American buyer makes, he or she will be indebted approximately $107.00 to the owners of the Federal Reserve, $21.40 for a $20.00 purchase, and $10.40 for every $10.00 purchase. Should the buyer use a debit card, the owners of the Federal Reserve's profit will increase by, at least, $.04.
Although this "national sales tax" - in reality - is somewhat better than the IRS' approximate 20% rate of extortion on the working man or woman's labor, it still does not meet the Constitutional criteria for a lawful monetary system.
It is my opinion that a "national sales tax" will not resolve the economic realities that are brought about by a debt based monetary system that is owned and operated by a cartel of private bankers; a Plutocracy.
From the "Title" definition of H.R.25 as found on the web, and the reasons given above, I will answer:
d... "Leans Against Support of HR25"
Thank you for requesting my feedback. I hope you will consider refocusing the energy of Americans For Fair Tax in a manner consistent with the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic.
Candidate Veronica Hannevig (District 10 PA)
H.R.25
Title: To promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.
As I see it, on top of credit card, car, and mortgage payments and interest, approximately $9.96 is the laboring man's debt to the owners of the Federal Reserve for each $10.00 of his labor. Here's how:
The "bill" which a laboring man perceives he has earned for his labor cost the Federal Reserve approximately4.2 cents to print - regardless of its denomination. In reality this means that for every $10.00 of a man's labor, he is in debt approximately $9.96 to the owners of the Federal Reserve; $19.96 for every $20.00, and $99.96 for every $100.00.
Should the proposed "national sales tax" be implemented at a typical 7% using the current currency: For every $100.00 purchase the American buyer makes, he or she will be indebted approximately $107.00 to the owners of the Federal Reserve, $21.40 for a $20.00 purchase, and $10.40 for every $10.00 purchase. Should the buyer use a debit card, the owners of the Federal Reserve's profit will increase by, at least, $.04.
Although this "national sales tax" - in reality - is somewhat better than the IRS' approximate 20% rate of extortion on the working man or woman's labor, it still does not meet the Constitutional criteria for a lawful monetary system.
It is my opinion that a "national sales tax" will not resolve the economic realities that are brought about by a debt based monetary system that is owned and operated by a cartel of private bankers; a Plutocracy.
From the "Title" definition of H.R.25 as found on the web, and the reasons given above, I will answer:
d... "Leans Against Support of HR25"
Thank you for requesting my feedback. I hope you will consider refocusing the energy of Americans For Fair Tax in a manner consistent with the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic.
Candidate Veronica Hannevig (District 10 PA)
Saturday, August 21, 2004
"What do you think you can accomplish in a Democrat and Republican controlled Congress?"
I have been asked the question; "What do you think you can accomplish in a Democrat and Republican controlled Congress?"
If this is your question, here is my reply:
Realistically, little can be done by a "freshman" in Congress; and the present congressman's record has shown him to be no exception to this reality. Unlike the present Congressman, however, I have not compromised the integrity of my allegiance to the people in our geographic area. I do not sit on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania. As such, I can, with your help, make sensible decisions on behalf of our children, our grandchildren, and our beloved nation.
My first term goals in the U.S. House of Representatives are to:
- Co-Sponsor "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004"; HR 3799,
- Promote legislative awareness for self responsible "Homeland Security and Defense" as provided for in the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution as ratified in December, 1791,
- Begin the process of returning the federal government to its Constitutionally defined limits, and
- Defend and protect the unalienable Right of "the People" to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness as they exercise their intellectual and tangible property in creative, moral and ethical ways within their communities.
Thank you for your vote.
I have been asked the question; "What do you think you can accomplish in a Democrat and Republican controlled Congress?"
If this is your question, here is my reply:
Realistically, little can be done by a "freshman" in Congress; and the present congressman's record has shown him to be no exception to this reality. Unlike the present Congressman, however, I have not compromised the integrity of my allegiance to the people in our geographic area. I do not sit on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania. As such, I can, with your help, make sensible decisions on behalf of our children, our grandchildren, and our beloved nation.
My first term goals in the U.S. House of Representatives are to:
- Co-Sponsor "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004"; HR 3799,
- Promote legislative awareness for self responsible "Homeland Security and Defense" as provided for in the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution as ratified in December, 1791,
- Begin the process of returning the federal government to its Constitutionally defined limits, and
- Defend and protect the unalienable Right of "the People" to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness as they exercise their intellectual and tangible property in creative, moral and ethical ways within their communities.
Thank you for your vote.
Monday, July 26, 2004
The Constitution Restoration Act Of 2004: The Most Important Legislation In The Last Fifty Years
In February, 2004, a bill was introduced in both chambers of Congress to "limit the jurisdiction of Federal courts in certain cases and promote federalism." The House version is H.R. 3799, and the Senate's original version was S. 2082. The bill is titled, "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004." Initial sponsors of the bill include Rep. Robert Aderholt (AL), Rep. Michael Pence (IN), Sen. Richard Shelby (AL), Sen. Zell Miller (GA), Sen. Sam Brownback (KS), and Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC). Even though the introduction of this bill received little national media attention, it is the most important legislation in the last fifty years. I would encourage you to take a look at these bills, compare the changes that were made to the original Senate Bill by current 17th Amendment Senators, and urge you to contact your Congressional representatives to sign on to the original bills as "co-sponsors".
Saturday, July 17, 2004
Home (and) Land Security for Responsible People and Their Families vs Fear and Anxiety Perpetrated by "Homeland Security"
Efforts to ease requirements for permits fought
By Eric Swedlund
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
Ten years after it became legal to carry a concealed weapon in Arizona with a permit, proponents say the law has been an absolute success, increasing self-defense options for law-abiding adults without a consequential increase in crime. .
. . Continue . . .
Monday, July 05, 2004
World Daily Net Commentary
Keep the Declaration alive
By: Alan Keyes
As we gather in our beloved America to observe the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, let us emulate our founders in their faithfulness to the truth – a bold faithfulness that gave birth to this nation.
Let us reflect on a founding generation born into a world characterized by despotism and tyranny and slavery, into an era dominated by philosophy and practice and institutions based upon inequality and the denial of human freedom – and celebrate our great founders' recognition and radical assertion of the universal rights of man.
Tyranny and inequality were not then considered to be unusual or changeable conditions, but our founders were wise, courageous and prudent enough to recognize the truth and plant the seeds of that liberty which would overturn centuries of despotism and become the foundation for a successful struggle, even against the age-old institution of slavery. To those who persist in denigrating our founders and their legacy of liberty, I say this: I would rather show respect for that generation which, though born into an era of slavery, planted the seeds of liberty, than to be part of a generation that, born into an era of liberty, plants the seeds of renewed slavery and bondage.
. . .
I can think of a fate worse than being born into a generation that accepted slavery: it is to be born into the generation that renewed the bondage of slavery for millions yet unborn. And if we are not careful, that will be our fate.
How can we avoid it? I think it's simple. . . .
Click here for the entire article.
Sunday, June 27, 2004
Do you know who your Congressperson and Senator are serving?
Are you aware that your Congressperson and Senator may be making decisions on behalf of the United Nations Association of the United States of America?
Isn't it time to cast your vote for a principled candidate who will uphold his oath of office as President to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States"?
Isn't it time to cast your vote for principled Congressional and Legislative candidates who "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this (United States) Constitution" as ratified December 15, 1791?
Friday, June 11, 2004
The Lawful and Legal aspects of
United States Constitutional Government.
"Republic"
"Communism"----------- L - e - g - a - l --- "Fascism"
"We The People"
The choice is ours.
Article. I.
Section 1.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
. . .
Section. 3.
Clause 1: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, (See 17th Amendment) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
. . .
Section. 8.
Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power
. . .
Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And
Clause 18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Section. 9.
. . .
Clause 4: No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
. . .
Section. 10.
Clause 1: . . . gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
. . .
Tuesday, June 08, 2004
The 'Fear Factor' in small town America.
As I continue to collect signatures for ballot access on behalf of the Constitution Party (and myself) in my home area I am amazed by the cowardice of the people to make a stand for what they believe.
I've been told by local people on more than one occasion that their signature on previous petitions had compromised the jobs of themselves or their loved ones. They are not convinced that their names, once submitted to the Department of State in Harrisburg, will not be shared with political gatekeepers within the Democrat and Republican parties and they, and members of their families, will be ostracized or black-balled for their desire for diversity, tolerance, and positive change within the democratic process of our Constitutional republic.
American Veterans in Domestic Defense reminds us of our duties as Americans in their post: Whose Job Is It?.
As I continue to collect signatures for ballot access on behalf of the Constitution Party (and myself) in my home area I am amazed by the cowardice of the people to make a stand for what they believe.
I've been told by local people on more than one occasion that their signature on previous petitions had compromised the jobs of themselves or their loved ones. They are not convinced that their names, once submitted to the Department of State in Harrisburg, will not be shared with political gatekeepers within the Democrat and Republican parties and they, and members of their families, will be ostracized or black-balled for their desire for diversity, tolerance, and positive change within the democratic process of our Constitutional republic.
American Veterans in Domestic Defense reminds us of our duties as Americans in their post: Whose Job Is It?.
Friday, June 04, 2004
CURRENT OPTIONS and CHOICES for AMERICANS
Move to South Carolina and re-colonize with like minded Christians.
Move to New Hampshire and re-colonize with like minded Libertarians.
Use "I" statements to voice your personal opinion to at least one new person every day and during public meetings with your local government.
Sample of a template that is typically used:
When _______, (describe the action or event)
I feel/felt _______, (betrayed, confused, etc.)
because _______. (Use facts.)
I would appreciate _______. (Have a realistic plan.)
How can we make this happen? (Establish a record of commitment.)
(Use the same pattern to encourage positive actions.)
Assist minor party candidates with whom you agree with their petition requirements for ballot access.
Consider Constitution Party candidates.
Assert your First Amendment Right to redress by joining the We The People class action lawsuit.
Move to New Hampshire and re-colonize with like minded Libertarians.
Use "I" statements to voice your personal opinion to at least one new person every day and during public meetings with your local government.
Sample of a template that is typically used:
When _______, (describe the action or event)
I feel/felt _______, (betrayed, confused, etc.)
because _______. (Use facts.)
I would appreciate _______. (Have a realistic plan.)
How can we make this happen? (Establish a record of commitment.)
(Use the same pattern to encourage positive actions.)
Assist minor party candidates with whom you agree with their petition requirements for ballot access.
Consider Constitution Party candidates.
Assert your First Amendment Right to redress by joining the We The People class action lawsuit.