Friday, May 31, 2013
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Congressional Testimony
In closing I ask:
Additional information:
Supporting evidence: Due Process Defenders.
Web Page 1: http://heros-heroines.blogspot.com/2010/01/irredentists-controversy.html
It is apparent that Judge Barrasse had not considered section 9.54 of Lipson's manual wherein it lists 16 grounds for "Objecting to the Examination" and includes Justice Douglas' landmark decision in Schlagenhauf v. Holder, i.e.; "And a doctor for a fee can easily discover something wrong with any patient . . . ".
Rather than simply stating the validity of the remaining six (6) charges that were predicated on the primary charges previously acquitted by Judge Geroulo on August 31, 2006 (see "ORDER" 06 S 64 to the right), Judge Barrasse had me imprisoned for four (4) days in the Lackawanna County Prison and on 7/8/2008 Judge Barrasse waived the fines and costs that was always within his power to waive, and on 1/13/2009, in a stealth move, simply swept the whole matter "under the rug" by falsifying the records with a "Penalty Satisfied" so that the casual observer would presume that I had participated in his decision. (See Trezevant v. City of Tampa 741 F.2d 336.)
Like Judges Sean McGraw and Vito Geroulo, Judge Barrasse (again) ignored both lawful and legal basic rules of procedure to examine the substantive evidence presented and require statutory claim to the contrary. By way of a Petition for Review I ask(ed) only that the court render right ruling consistent with the Oath of Office that they and their predecessors had taken. Offset of each charge is - and has been - conditioned upon substantive statutory proof of the validity of each of the instant claims.
It is becoming increasingly evident that the United States' and its governments have become occupied by a power foreign to the American People. Absent any proof to the contrary, I have come to believe that members of the Democrat and Republican parties are duty bound to legislate 13th Amendment 'voluntary servitude' on behalf of the owners of the Federal Reserve. The laws that they make are promulgated to 'duly convict of crime' any American who chooses not to volunteer their property and labor into the jurisdiction of this oligarchy of plutocrats.
So I ask:
1. Because a duly authorized Title 4 U.S.C., Section 1, 2, 3 American Flag - the flag to which I pledged my allegiance - was captured and not returned by City of Wilkes-Barre (PA) police on February 24, 2005 and City of Carbondale police on February 1, 2006; Are municipal police officers violating their oaths of office when they willfully collude with the seditious guerrilla activities of a belligerent occupying power? Or, Are municipal officers/agents "in fact" the willing hirelings of a belligerent occupying power? Is the prison system in the U.S. essentially a gulag?
2. Because each and every Federal Reserve note is 'debt based' and conditional upon the 'good faith and credit of the American People' (including me); How can any American be compelled to pay an alleged "debt" with a Federal Reserve created 'debt instrument' to which they, the American People, themselves are the Creditor, i.e., the "holder in due course"? Have judges acquiesced to legislated doublespeak (and peer pressure) that was designed to entrap American men and women into statutory "peonage" in which, if they do not comply voluntarily, they can be held "in contempt of court" and condemned to debtors prison?
3. Is there no judge or legislator who will 'stand in the gap' on behalf of an American who, as a matter of conscious, refuses to acquiesce his or her property and/or labor to a foreign power? Or, have all become puppets of a belligerent occupying power?
See U.S. Army's Field Manual 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare
Herein shown is one of the better examples of the types of legislative doublespeak that are eroding our perceived liberties.
Now, as all law abiding, good parents who love their children, know, the government mandates education, and they must provide a "birth certificate" to enroll their child in a public school. Notice how Article VIII of the Pennsylvania Constitution reads in Section 1:
Uniformity of Taxation:
If you have access to a Pennsylvania 'Certification of Birth' hold it up to the light and notice the 'chain link' watermark."All taxes shall be uniform, upon the same class of subjects, within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and shall be levied and collected under general laws."
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Is "Reconciliation" the Solution to the Debt Crisis?
Ask Marilyn: Is This the Solution to the Debt Crisis? | Parade.com Gary Dalessandro of Sharpsville, Pa., writes: What's the solution to this problem?
A tourist stops at a small hotel, puts a $100 bill on the counter, and goes to inspect a room. The owner takes the bill and rushes off to pay the butcher, to whom he owes $100. The butcher races to his wholesaler and pays off his own $100 debt. The wholesaler hurries to the farmer and gives him $100 for the pigs he bought. The farmer hands over $100 to the party planner who set up his bachelor bash. The party planner heads to the hotel to pay the $100 she owes for the party room and lays the bill on the counter. At that point, the tourist returns to the front desk, says that the room is unsatisfactory, picks up the $100, and departs. The tourist has his money back, and everyone else is $100 ahead by reducing his or her debt by that amount. Could this be the answer to the debt crisis?
Actually, everyone stayed exactly the same. For example, the farmer was owed $100 by someone, but he also owed $100 to someone else. The payments canceled one another out.
Friday, April 20, 2012
The "Industrial Revolution"?
Who profited?
Consider this graphic "Anthracite Combination" and the relationship Banks had with Railroads through their Directorships.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Monday, January 16, 2012
MANY A TRUTH IS TOLD IN JEST
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved?
(14) ``State'' means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) ``United States'' means--
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
From Dissolution in PA —The Death Of A Pennsylvania Business Corporation:
. . . a shareholder or director may petition the court of common pleas to order the winding up and involuntary dissolution of the corporation if and only if one of the following is established:
The acts of the directors, or those in control of the corporation are illegal, oppressive or fraudulent and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved;
The corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted, and it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved; or
The directors are deadlocked in the direction of the management of the business and affairs of the corporation and the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock, such that irreparable injury to the corporation is being suffered or is threatened as a result.
In the absence of illegal or fraudulent activity, a misappropriation of assets to the detriment of one or more shareholders, or irreconcilable differences amongst the board of directors, the corporation’s unhappy shareholders may have no recourse but to suffer the perceived mismanagement or sell their stock, often at a tremendous loss.
Saturday, February 05, 2011
"PERSON" POWER: WHO'S IN CONTROL?
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Have the American people been the unknowing victims of TREASONOUS FRAUD?
How important is an Oath of Office?
Were you, or are you now, in the U.S. military? Were you told that the U.S. or State you served was defined under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (14)(15)?
Sunday, January 09, 2011
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Treason, sedition, and subversive activities
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Monday, July 05, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
CAMPAIGN 2010 - PENNSYLVANIA
315 Main Street, Simpson, Pennsylvania 18407
WELFARE AND POVERTY I will work to abolish all federal welfare programs and un-shackle ministries from their 501c3 restraints so that they are at liberty to facilitate vocations within their assemblies according to the needs of their local community.
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance?
So; What form of government has the United States?
And, what is "the crown"?
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Pleze Br'er Fox don't throw me in the Briar Patch
This is what members of Congress did for investors:
Said Br'er Rabbit (the Investors) to Br'er Fox (the Senate) as Br'er Bear (the House) stood by;
Then Br'er Fox (the Senators) and Br'er Bear (the Representatives), in their perfunctory dysfunctional manner, resolve their differences by negotiation.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Friday, October 23, 2009
What happened with the "bailout" money?
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Check out the facts regarding Senator Casey's support of ACORN funding and become an informed electorate.
Click on http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423950217 to link to the August 21, 2008 Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures post by Amaris Elliott-Engel at Pennsylvania Law Weekly to see how the legislative Casey and judicial Munley families continue to promulgate influence and legislation in order to adjudicate protections and defenses for owners of global banks and the controversial Non-Governmental Organization, ACORN.
In Lackawanna County, since - at least - the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, it seems to have been a common practice for these prominent families (i.e., the legislative Casey and the judicial Munley) to collude in seditious activities that broker the men and women of our nation into Thirteenth Amendment 're-constructed' statutory “servitude” to a corporate jurisdiction. Their backroom dealings have been without “full disclosure” of the adhesive and unconscionable natures of what I consider to be treasonous contracts that have allowed a statutory governance to be erected within the parameters of our intended form of government.
One example of how this contractual 'revenuing' (no pun intended) into a foreign corporate jurisdiction is being done, had been previously posted. In that example I ask: "BONDS": Are they UNCONSCIONABLE, IN VIOLATION of RICO STATUTES, or TREASON? and give an example of how we, American men and women who believe our selves to be free, have been "ceded" by legislative brokers into a type of corporate feudalism under what appears to be the same "Crown" business-as-usual enterprise system of governance that colonized the "new world" in the 17th Century on behalf of its investors.
So, again I bring your attention to Harrisburg Bureau Chief, Robert Swift’s December 3, 2008 article wherein he quotes Pennsylvania Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-116 as saying; “Integrity is built in the DNA of the Casey family” and ask you, the reader to look past the wordsmiths’ rhetoric and decide for your self whether “integrity” can be for good or for evil.
Check out the facts and become an informed electorate.
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
AGENDA 21, ECOSYSTEMS, HEALTH-CARE, and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY
In this age of "corporate governance" where ALL law is contingent on what we, the people, allow via our contract with our representatives to this government I present to you the information we're being given to understand the connections between the United Nation's AGENDA 21 'programmes and projects' for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders".
"FULL disclosure" MUST be demanded of our legislators! Help them to perform their tasks and duties with the integrity you expect from them.
Consider the following and share your thoughts with your legislators. Help them to frame their questions to lobbyists who are pushing a global agenda for an oligarchy of plutocrats.
"Stakeholder" "Ownership and sustainability" is being encouraged by the World Health Organization through:
" . . . SPI aims to increase combined coverage of services for TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria. It encourages ownership and sustainability of these services, and strives to help countries produce practical methods to deliver prevention and care for the three diseases."
And,
Ecosystems and health - There is growing concern amongst many natural scientists that human interventions are altering the capacity of ecosystems to provide their goods (e.g. freshwater, food, pharmaceutical products, etc) and services (e.g. purification of air, water, soil, sequestration of pollutants, etc).And, "special interest" lobbyist's for Wall Street investors and bankers are now gearing up to "securitize" "life settlement" policies "by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " (The rest of the article is below: Wall St. now investing in death.)
If we, the people, believe what we are told - that We, the people, are the government - and understand how these seditious activities are usurping our authority to govern our selves, then all members of Congress and our state legislators require our oversight.
Let your representative know what you know so that he (also she) will know that you know that he knows!
Quit giving your 'law-makers' "wiggle-room" to pass treasonous "bills of attainder" for a foreign oligarchy that mandates you either willingly participate in their constructive fraud or be duly convicted of their statutory crime(s) and be jailed!
And, because ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL under the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, if you - a "U.S. citizen" - choose not to 'voluntarily' comply with federally legislated mandates for your health care (unless you speak-up NOW) you may be 'duly convicted of a crime'.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Congress requires our oversight.
So: What's the next step for a free people?
- Reaffirm your allegiance to the organic principles of our constitutional republic.
- Become involved in the October 10, 2009 election process to elect delegates to the November 9 - 22 Continental Congress of 2009.
- Learn more about the Continental Congress 2009 at http://www.cc2009.us/about-cc2009.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Recommended Reading: the psychological advantage for those who will usurp the wealth of our nation.
THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE
Copyright 192o, by Harper & Brothers
Printed in the United States of America
Published February, 1920
From pages 390 - 391
"One of the basic postulates of profitable production is the equilibrium of all its essential factors-such as the laborer's wages, the cost of the machinery and the material, the administration. Bring discord into the harmony and the entire mechanism is out of gear.
"The Russian workman, who is at bottom an illiterate peasant with the old roots of serfdom still clinging to him, has seldom any bowels for his neighbor and none at all for his employer. "God Himself commands us to despoil such gentry," is one of his sayings. He is in a hurry to enrich himself, and he cares about nothing else. Nor can he realize that to beggar his neighbors is to impoverish himself. Hence he always takes and never gives ; as a peasant he destroys the forests, hewing trees and planting none, and robs the soil of its fertility. On analogous lines he would fain deal with the factories, exacting exorbitant wages that eat up all profit, and naively expecting the owner to go on paying them as though he were the trustee of a fund for enriching the greedy. The only people to profit by the system, and even they only transiently, were the manual laborers. The bulk of the skilled, intelligent, and educated artisans were held up to contempt and ostracized, or killed as an odious aristocracy. . . . "